The Birth of Jesus

This is just noting a few of the most notable issues I’ve found with the Jesus birth accounts, which is by no means exhaustive, but merely the ones I noted during my study of the Bible at the beginning of the decline of my faith. While these have been well documented by many scholars, I came about these by reading nothing but the Bible about five years ago, which I then looked to outside sources to corroborate.


Only two of the four gospels, Matthew and Luke, deem Jesus’ birth to be a noteworthy event (seems pretty fucking important to me, but hey, I’m no 1st century scribe who heard this story second or third hand, so what the hell do I know?). John tells us only of the Incarnation – that the Logos “became flesh” – while Mark doesn’t say anything about Jesus until his baptism at around 30 years old (he probably didn’t do anything important in that time anyways). Certainly Mark knows nothing of the Annunciation or the Virgin Birth. In fact, Mark’s account seems to indicate there was no angelic announcement of Jesus’ birth and godliness, since in 3:30-31, Jesus’ family declare him to be “out of his mind” upon declaring himself the Son of Man. Then again, maybe Mary and Joseph were on to him.

There are discrepancies in the genealogies of the gospels, which I’ll merely link to and move on.

Luke 2 tells us that Jesus was born in Nazareth, while Matthew 2 tells us that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, and moved to Nazareth after his return from Egypt.

In one of the gospels, Jesus is visited by three wise men. In another, by three shepherds. But whatever, maybe these shepherds were very wise. The problem is they followed a star directly to Jesus’ location. Can you find the star that sits DIRECTLY over your house?

Then there’s the issue of the Roman census talked about in Luke 2. It indicates that Joseph was an inhabitant of Nazareth, yet for some reason was compelled to travel to the “city of David called Bethlehem, because he was descended from the house and family of David.” The genealogies given to us by Luke list dozens of generations between David and Joseph. It’s doubtful that Joseph would even know his genealogy going back this far, let alone which part of his genealogy to trace back (I, personally, would have no idea whether to follow my family line back to Ireland, England, Sweden, Finland, Norway or Northwest America). Furthermore, why the fuck would he be required to return to the land of his ancestors anyways, when a census would likely require him to register himself in the town he lives in? This would be a ridiculous way to conduct a census. Like, Ron Paul ridiculous.


~ by kriskodisko on December 24, 2012.

One Response to “The Birth of Jesus”

  1. Odd, I thought this would be about how the date of Jesus’ birth is unknown, and the wise men (if they showed up at all) didn’t show up until years after Jesus was born. Lol. There are lots of reasons for differences between gospels. They were written for different audiences, at different times, and in different contexts. (Scroll down to “Content” section, though I’m guessing you’ve already researched this pretty thoroughly, considering it’s uh… you. hehe.) Not sure about the census part. *thinks* I must look into it.

    Weird question: If the Bible was perfect would you believe it moreso? Seems to me that a perfectly written book is just as sketchy as an imperfect one. haha.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: